You are on eastlansinginfo.org, ELi's old domain, which is now an archive of news (as of early April, 2020). If you are looking for the latest news, go to eastlansinginfo.news and update your bookmarks accordingly!
You are on eastlansinginfo.org, ELi's old domain, which is now an archive of news (as of early April, 2020). If you are looking for the latest news, go to eastlansinginfo.news and update your bookmarks accordingly!
Photo: Strathmore Development's unfinished project in Ann Arbor
Today, “Ask Eli” responds to a question that arose in conversation with ELi readers following this week’s City Council meeting. As ELi reported, many citizens spoke at Council to object to the City considering a proposal from Park District Investment Group (PDIG) for redevelopment of the blighted corner at Grand River Avenue and Abbot Road, particularly because PDIG won’t reveal exactly who owns the company.
Everyone weighing in on the debate publicly seems to agree on one thing: they want the blighted corner redeveloped, and soon. So:
The question: What’s the fear in East Lansing about PDIG?
Background: A number of citizens have insisted that City Council, City boards, and City commissions should not be considering the proposal from PDIG unless they know who exactly owns PDIG. The concern in this case is not uncertainty per se, but that PDIG is ultimately tied to developer Scott Chappelle, principal of Strathmore Development Company.
As outlined below, Strathmore has a troubling record—including at this very corner site in East Lansing—of failing to get projects built and of entangling projects in lawsuits, liens, and foreclosure actions.
A letter from PDIG’s representative this week did not clear up the question of ownership, but did suggest that the major principal in PDIG is Charlie Crouch, a long-time business associate of Scott Chappelle, principal of Strathmore Development. In fact, the letter was signed by an attorney who has long been Strathmore’s lawyer for development projects. All this suggests strong connections between PDIG and Strathmore.
So what is the fear?
The short answer: Among those objecting to the situation, the fear is that, rather than getting rid of the blight, by trying to work with PDIG the City of East Lansing may be entering a situation where the City is prolonging the blight—by working with a developer they fear simply can’t produce. Some also fear the City will end up losing money from working with PDIG, because other municipalities and public investment systems have run into costly problems (see below).
The longer answer: Strathmore Development was the group that was supposed to bring us City Center II at this very site. It never happened. This isn’t the only place where a big project proposed by Strathmore Development or its affiliated companies never happened. Another good example would be the “Broadway Village” project in Ann Arbor. As Judy McGovern reported for the Ann Arbor Observer, “instead of shiny new condos, retail, and office space promised by the developer, Broadway Village is 6.4 acres of unmowed field ringed by a chain link fence.” (See photo above for a recent picture of "Broadway Village.")
Here in East Lansing, Strathmore Development promised to demolish the publicly-owned “Little Bank Building” at 303 Abbot Road as part of City Center II. Instead, the company “completed the salvage of all recyclable and reusable materials,” rendering it unusable, and left it standing, derelict. (See p. 5 of PDF here for the quotation.) Strathmore has also left the Evergreen Arms, which was an actively-used apartment building along Valley Court, derelict and vacant. Same thing with the two-story commercial building next to Peoples Church's memorial garden. What we got out of "City Center II" under Strathmore was more blight.
That, though, constitutes just a small sample of the history worrying citizens who are showing up to speak at Council and other public boards charged with overseeing approval of this project’s many parts. I asked Eliot Singer, a citizen watchdog who has been tracking Strathmore and its relations, to give us a summary report of what he has found by searching through registers of deeds, assessment records, court cases, and news stories. This is Singer’s summary history of Strathmore Development Company-affiliated projects with foreclosures and mortgage defaults:
Not included here, says Singer, are “numerous lis pendens (foreclosure notices) from contractor liens or numerous tax liens by federal, state, and local governments.” You can read about those in part here in a letter Singer sent to the East Lansing Brownfield Development Authority, and in Singer’s reports to Public Response.
The bottom line: A number of citizens are alarmed at this situation, concerned that the City may be facing additional debt and prolonged blight if the City tries to work with PDIG on this very big, very important project. Nevertheless, City Planning staff and the City Attorney have maintained that the City should continue moving through the process without scrutinizing, at this point, the ownership and financial situation of PDIG.
Take, for example, the remarks of City Planning staffer Lori Mullins at the November 20, 2014, meeting of the East Lansing Brownfield Redevelopment Authority (BRA), when the BRA was considering giving tax incentives to PDIG for this project, as captured in an audio recording of the meeting:
Speaking in response to a letter from Singer and public comments from former City Councilmember Ralph Monsma, a member of the BRA asked Mullins, “Does it matter who the members of PDIG are? I just don’t know. I don’t have a review on it, but, I mean, do we care? Is it important? Do we look stupid if we don’t know the answer?”
The City’s Lori Mullins replied, “In terms of who the developer is, you know, Mr. Eckhardt [lawyer for PDIG; long-time lawyer for Strathmore] is here, he’s representing PDIG and he’s been sort of our representative. And then you know we have talked with a couple of owners in the project, but we certainly don’t—staff certainly doesn’t have a list of all the owners—we don’t really think it is necessary to look into all that at this point.”
The BRA then proceeded to talk further about moving PDIG's proposal through the process of being approved for tax incentives.
What does Council think? At Council this week, three Councilmembers were actively involved in the discussion of at what point the City should start paying attention to the ownership and trustworthiness of PDIG: Mayor Nathan Triplett, Ruth Beier, and Kathy Boyle.This week, following the intense discussion at Council, I asked the three of them by email to clarify why, given that the project proposal requires the use of now-publicly-owned land (including the Little Bank Building at 303 Abbot Road), City Council can’t at this point assess whether it makes sense to continue talking about a public-private partnership with PDIG.
Just to be clear, City Attorney Tom Yeadon and Triplett have said that Council can't talk about this as site plan reviewers. But could they theoretically talk about PDIG's owners' track records as potential business partners to PDIG? At Council, there seemed to be clear agreement that if an owner of a property that is part of a site proposal wants to pull out of that proposal, it can, and the City is just such an owner of land required for the proposed area.
In response to my question about this, Beier says that she is checking on the question with the City Attorney.
Triplett has not answered.
Boyle responded, “Because of the expressed desire of so many East Lansing people that new development occur at that location, we need to seriously consider the current proposal.”
In other words, some people in East Lansing want redevelopment badly enough that they believe the risk that others see with PDIG, if it exists, is worth taking with publically-owned land and public money.
Photo of Broadway Village courtesy of Jim Anderson
"Ask ELi to Investigate" accepts all kinds of questions about East Lansing! Submit yours through our contact form.
ELi brings you what no one else does: non-commercial, factual, citizen-reporting of what's happening in East Lansing. If you want us to keep bringing you this high-quality service, you need to contribute to make it happen. Donate easily on line or donate by check. Because ELi is a recognized 501(c)3 nonprofit organization, serving the people of East Lansing, your donations are tax deductible.
eastlansinginfo.org © 2013-2020 East Lansing Info